It's true - besides the fact they're both drug addicts (once an addict, always an addict - it's a lifetime disease - and perhaps indicates a real problem with judgement) they are both liars and make things up. they also never tell the entire truth to their viewers/listeners.
And you have what amount of proof that what Beck says is a lie?
It is easy to cast an aspersion without basis. Perhaps they HAD problems, and now they have overcome them? So they have traded one addiction with another. Now, instead of looking for dope, they find the facts, particularly about people with a written history of really shady dealings.
So, instead of going off on a tangent, how about showing where Beck is off his nut?
Nothing about Beck is "fact." Have you watched his show in the last two months? Communist art on 30 Rock? You're kidding, right? That and he appears to be classically unbalanced emotionally - for instance, the video he released after his butt-surgery, and the insanity of his 9-12 project show, which even Fox anchors cringed at and made fun of. Calling the President a racist? No fact there, only pure opinion. the man in unhinged, and it won't come as a shock when Murdoch dumps him for the things he says and because he's hogging valuable air time Newscorp could use to sell expensive ads - seems 57 of the world's largest businesses have said they'll no longer advertise on his program. No tangent there Estrada - plenty of evidence and I'd imagine you even suspect his equilibrium from time to time. Hell, you can be conservative and still think one of your own is nuts - some of us worry very much about Dennis Kucinich and really now, do you blame us?
So where is this famous eveidence. I have been watching some of the programs. Not all, but enough to get a good idea that while he is excitable, he is on the mark.
And why would Murdoch dump a man who is making money for the network? So far, the dreaded boycott has backfired, Wal_mart still makes money selling Beck Books, and his show if highly rated, beating the others, CNN, MSNBC like a lame mule.
Whatever you or I may think about Beck, he still has a large enough audience to ensure he is around long after Olberman fosillizes, and Maddow is released for lack of interest.
You still haven;t proved your original pint, nor disproven anything Beck said, merely listed some grievences together.
5 comments:
GLEN BECK????????HA HA HA HA.....How many other ex dope heads views do you take as Gospel? Oh, Limbaugh, right.....
It's true - besides the fact they're both drug addicts (once an addict, always an addict - it's a lifetime disease - and perhaps indicates a real problem with judgement) they are both liars and make things up. they also never tell the entire truth to their viewers/listeners.
And you have what amount of proof that what Beck says is a lie?
It is easy to cast an aspersion without basis. Perhaps they HAD problems, and now they have overcome them? So they have traded one addiction with another. Now, instead of looking for dope, they find the facts, particularly about people with a written history of really shady dealings.
So, instead of going off on a tangent, how about showing where Beck is off his nut?
Nothing about Beck is "fact." Have you watched his show in the last two months? Communist art on 30 Rock? You're kidding, right? That and he appears to be classically unbalanced emotionally - for instance, the video he released after his butt-surgery, and the insanity of his 9-12 project show, which even Fox anchors cringed at and made fun of. Calling the President a racist? No fact there, only pure opinion. the man in unhinged, and it won't come as a shock when Murdoch dumps him for the things he says and because he's hogging valuable air time Newscorp could use to sell expensive ads - seems 57 of the world's largest businesses have said they'll no longer advertise on his program. No tangent there Estrada - plenty of evidence and I'd imagine you even suspect his equilibrium from time to time. Hell, you can be conservative and still think one of your own is nuts - some of us worry very much about Dennis Kucinich and really now, do you blame us?
So where is this famous eveidence. I have been watching some of the programs. Not all, but enough to get a good idea that while he is excitable, he is on the mark.
And why would Murdoch dump a man who is making money for the network? So far, the dreaded boycott has backfired, Wal_mart still makes money selling Beck Books, and his show if highly rated, beating the others, CNN, MSNBC like a lame mule.
Whatever you or I may think about Beck, he still has a large enough audience to ensure he is around long after Olberman fosillizes, and Maddow is released for lack of interest.
You still haven;t proved your original pint, nor disproven anything Beck said, merely listed some grievences together.
Post a Comment